https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 8 13:26:35 2015
New Revision: 231406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231406&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/48088
PR c/68657
* common.opt (Wframe-larger-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #5)
> Does it make sense to implement desired behaviour?
Probably not. We also don't accept two different values for
-Wframe-larger-than. But it would make s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-03-15
09:20:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Yeah. Confirmed.
> >
> > You need -Wframe-larger-than=500 -Werror=frame-larger-than which hopefully
> > doesn't reset th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
--- Comment #3 from Chris Demetriou 2011-03-14 22:56:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yeah. Confirmed.
>
> You need -Wframe-larger-than=500 -Werror=frame-larger-than which hopefully
> doesn't reset the value to 1.
It doesn't, but not for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48088
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
