http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
--- Comment #8 from meibf at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-21 15:16:05 UTC ---
Author: meibf
Date: Thu Oct 21 15:16:01 2010
New Revision: 165781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165781
Log:
2010-10-21 Bingfeng Mei
PR c/45834
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #7 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
--- Comment #6 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 13:57:19 UTC ---
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:53 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
>
> --- Comment #5 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
--- Comment #5 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-18 13:53:37
UTC ---
>
> Sure, but we have other means of dealing with that (MEM_ALIAS_SET == 0).
Do you mean this check is redundant here ? I dig out the ancient code (from
1997)
/* If both references
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
--- Comment #4 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 13:42:33 UTC ---
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:17 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
>
> --- Comment #3 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
--- Comment #3 from Bingfeng Mei 2010-10-18 12:16:59
UTC ---
I think that standard specifies that char * may refer to an alias of any
object, that's why QImode is different here. But I am not sure whether a
restrict qualifier will override that r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
--- Comment #2 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 11:38:03 UTC ---
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
>
> Bingfeng Mei changed:
>
> What
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834
Bingfeng Mei changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.guenther at gmail
