https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61175|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61171|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfinished testcase, with -Wunused-but-set-variable=1 this warns just about i
in foo,
with -Wunused-but-set-variable=2 about a, b, c, d, i and with
-Wunused-but-set-variable=3 about a, b, c, d, e, i. No war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61171
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61171&action=edit
gcc16-pr44677-wip.patch
So, I tried to implement this partially, so far in the C FE.
As we've been implementin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #20 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #19)
> However, the i++ is not completely useless, as this is a way to tell the
> compiler that the number of iterations is bounded by INT_MAX
I wouldn't say that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #19 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #18)
> *** Bug 119544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The example in this bug was
extern char* str;
void foo(void)
{
int i = 0;
while (*s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Warn for variables |Warn for variables
|in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #15 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
David Manuelda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stormbyte at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
eggert at cs dot ucla.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mytbk920423 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-06-28 00:34:58 |2020-5-19
--- Comment #10 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #8)
> I would expect handling -Wunused-but-set-variable during Gimplification to
> make detecting these sorts of things possible at least in the basic cases.
That is wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89180
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #6)
> I haven't thought through the implementation challenges but defining the
> extended -Wunused-but-set-variabl rule that's being suggested here seems
> straightforwa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hadrien-gcc at psydk dot org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||developm...@faf-ltd.com
--- Commen
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-28 00:34 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|norma
24 matches
Mail list logo
