--- Comment #4 from rmh dot gcc at aybabtu dot com 2009-12-29 16:03 ---
Mail to gcc-patches sent.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42537
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-12-29 13:11
---
Yes, I think can then go in as obvious. Actually, in my opinion, this kind of
"issue" with zero impact on the end-user experience, should go *only* to
gcc-patches, are not suitable for Bugzilla.
--
paolo do
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 12:47 ---
Please submit patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org rather than attaching the
patch here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42537
--- Comment #1 from rmh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-29 12:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=19412)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19412&action=view)
misc spelling fixes
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42537
