--- Comment #6 from freebse at live dot jp 2009-08-01 07:15 ---
Comment, thanks a lot of for everybody.
Indeed -O4 option doesn't exist.
-O4 described investigated by Google.
And...
sorry, I am not good at writing English.
Therefore, sentences might be a little strange.
It expects it o
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 16:55 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> And -O4 doesn't exist, FWIW.
well it does but it is the same as -O3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 16:36 ---
And -O4 doesn't exist, FWIW.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 16:07 ---
-fsee was removed on the trunk so closing as won't fix.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 11:34 ---
Perhaps it would be better just to remove it in the next GCC 4.4 release (I
guess it has been fixed/removed in GCC 4.5). Telling people not to use it after
they discover it is broken is a bit useless.
--
manu at gcc
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 10:22 ---
Don't use -fsee.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
