--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-22 19:58 ---
As discussed, not a bug.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #5 from bmerry at gmail dot com 2009-07-28 07:28 ---
Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. It's slightly annoying that the behaviour is
different from glibc (I use -std=c89 so that the compiler keeps me honest,
since I'm working on code that has to compile on compilers that still h
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-07-27 21:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: stdarg.h does not define va_copy when building
for C89+POSIX
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, bmerry at gmail dot com wrote:
> POSIX 2001 specifies that va_copy
> (http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/00969
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-27 19:48 ---
*** Bug 40879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40880
--- Comment #2 from bmerry at gmail dot com 2009-07-27 19:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=18259)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18259&action=view)
Preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40880
--- Comment #1 from bmerry at gmail dot com 2009-07-27 19:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=18258)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18258&action=view)
Source file illustrating the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40880
