[Bug c/40435] [4.5 regression] Many regressions on trunk

2009-06-15 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 02:36 --- To add something useful, I should have mentioned that they were ok for 148440, regressed for 148444 for cris-elf, so that leaves only commit's from Aldy and Steven B., IIUC. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug c/40435] [4.5 regression] Many regressions on trunk

2009-06-15 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 02:28 --- Mee too! I mean, seen for cris-elf too! BTW, isn't it odd that for recent regressions, the committer's testing never seem to have shown the regressions seen by "every other target" after commit? 1/2 ;) (Definitely _not_

[Bug c/40435] [4.5 regression] Many regressions on trunk

2009-06-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-13 21:28 --- Wshadow-3.c and pr36902.c are definitely mine. My original request for approval indicated that these were problems with fold being location agnostic, and that I would be addressing the issues post merge. The func-ptr

[Bug c/40435] [4.5 regression] Many regressions on trunk

2009-06-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-06-13 20:27 --- Or revision 148442: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00422.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/40435] [4.5 regression] Many regressions on trunk

2009-06-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-06-13 20:22 --- It may be caused by revision 148438: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00418.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---