--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-26 03:27 ---
When porting code such as in the description, it can be argued that
robustifying the code is an important part; that undefined code that just
happened to "work" for the initial target(s) is corrected to use defined
constr
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 04:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Actually this code is undefined. Using %s with a NULL pointer is undefined
> > so
> > GCC's behavior is correct.
> >
>
> You are wrong, the GCC behavior is
--- Comment #2 from Andrey dot Martchovsky at gmail dot com 2009-05-11
01:26 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Actually this code is undefined. Using %s with a NULL pointer is undefined so
> GCC's behavior is correct.
>
You are wrong, the GCC behavior is incorrect.
Please compile code a
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-11 01:15 ---
Actually this code is undefined. Using %s with a NULL pointer is undefined so
GCC's behavior is correct.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
