https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
R. Diez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdiez-2006 at rd10 dot de
--- Comment #14 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
Peter Damianov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Amelkin ---
Also happens with `gcc (Ubuntu 8.1.0-5ubuntu1~16.04) 8.1.0`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
Alexander Amelkin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||groungccg at amelkin dot msk.ru
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
--- Comment #9 from D. Hugh Redelmeier ---
Created attachment 32784
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32784&action=edit
minimal C source code that demonstrates the problem
minimal C source code that demonstrates the problem.
Not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to D. Hugh Redelmeier from comment #6)
> > If you can produce another similar example that works with printf, that
> > would also help.
>
> I don't think that printf is similar enough. A str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to D. Hugh Redelmeier from comment #6)
> > The best would be to include only the definitions of the types that you
> > need > and declare as 'extern' library functions that you use to avoid
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
--- Comment #6 from D. Hugh Redelmeier ---
Responding to Comment 5 by Manuel López-Ibáñez:
Thanks for looking at this.
> Could you produce a complete testcase
===
/* compile with -c -Wformat -Werror=format-nonliteral */
#include
extern void pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
Timo Sirainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tss at iki dot fi
--- Comment #3 from Tim
--- Comment #2 from 4tmuelle at informatik dot uni-hamburg dot de
2009-03-12 09:58 ---
Hey Richard. Thanks for the timely feedback.
As far as I know, it works more or less good for printf-wrappers. So I expected
this to be working for strftime as well.
I don't think that your proposed
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-12 09:40 ---
It won't work. You can either put the wrapper in a system header (add
#pragma GCC system_header) or build this TU with -fno-builtin-strftime.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39438
13 matches
Mail list logo
