--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 09:32 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2010-04-07 09:29 ---
This bug is still open, though it appears to be fixed. Is there any reason?
--
vincent at vinc17 dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 23:18 ---
This was fixed in the GCC 4.3 branch on 2009-02-25.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39034
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 19:21 ---
This was fixed in mainline by r141432, a fix for PR middle-end/36578. That bug
was a regression from 3.3 to 3.4. I'm testing a backport of that fix to the
4.3 branch.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #4 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 23:03 ---
Subject: Bug 39034
Author: bje
Date: Mon Feb 2 23:03:20 2009
New Revision: 143884
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143884
Log:
PR c/39034
* gcc.dg/dfp/pr39034.c: New test.
Added:
--- Comment #3 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 02:35 ---
Thanks for expanding the test case, Janis. I think this is worthy of a test
case in the regression testsuite, which I will submit now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39034
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
|
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 20:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=17214)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17214&action=view)
expanded testcase
I expanded the testcase to test both constant folding and runtime calculations
for all three de
--- Comment #1 from tydeman at tybor dot com 2009-01-30 17:31 ---
My analysis shows that
d10=0x2fe3=+3.e-15
So, d10 is not zero, while d2 is zero.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39034
