--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-18 09:28 ---
REOPENED. This testcase is not fixed by the patch in PR 36902.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 00:20 ---
Then the reduction missed something because I have a patch that fixes pr36902
and it doesn't fix this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-10/msg01117.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37921
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-27 00:17 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> H.J. Lu
>
> Why do you think this is a duplicate? I will keep it open and see if the patch
> that fixes PR 36902, also fixes this.
Because PR 36902 is a reduced testcase from the source p
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-26 22:40 ---
BTW, this is confirmed in GCC 4.4.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-26 22:24 ---
H.J. Lu
Why do you think this is a duplicate? I will keep it open and see if the patch
that fixes PR 36902, also fixes this.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-10-26 22:06 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36902 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from arjan at linux dot intel dot com 2008-10-26 18:17
---
Created an attachment (id=16553)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16553&action=view)
test case for bug 37921
gcc -c -Wall -Os -fno-strict-aliasing -o fadt.o fadt.c
leads to:
fadt.c: In functi
