--- Comment #3 from gcc at jme dot de 2008-10-07 23:29 ---
Hi Joseph,
because the the problem occurs only with the compiler switch -O.
And the problem occurs not if I place a "printf("xx")" between
the two statements "if" and "for". Therefore, I thought it was a
more target independend
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-06 15:59 ---
This will invoke
for (i=0; i<0; i++)
which invokes undefined behavior on signed integer overflow.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-10-06 11:58 ---
Subject: Re: New: Segmentation Fault Exception with -O and
signed array index
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, gcc at jme dot de wrote:
> The following code produces a segmentation fault when compiled with -O.
> Environment
