https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041
egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gdr at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #6)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > #ifdef __cplusplus
> > extern "C" {
> > #endif
> >
> > /* code that is C-only */
>
> This is not what exte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C" {
> #endif
>
> /* code that is C-only */
This is not what extern "C" means. The code still needs to be valid C++ and
this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-03 20:10 ---
We should collect individual Wc++-compat issues here.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2009-06-12 21:07 ---
-Wc++-compat now warns about alternative representations for operators and
punctuators such as "and". The other issues have not yet been addressed.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-08-07 12:04 ---
Subject: Re: -Wc++-compat refinements
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> To clarify how to implement this, I have some questions:
>
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > -Wc++-compat should allow b
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-07 11:54 ---
Confirmed as enhancement.
To clarify how to implement this, I have some questions:
(In reply to comment #0)
> -Wc++-compat should allow bool, wchar_t, char16_t and char32_t as typedefs
> defined in system headers, whi
