[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-29 23:22 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-29 23:19 --- Subject: Bug 35017 Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 29 23:19:07 2008 New Revision: 131945 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131945 Log: PR c/35017 * c-decl.c (start_decl): Don't pedwarn

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-29 18:24 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > TREE_READONLY isn't modifiable, so I guess that part is quite clear and I'm > also >

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-29 17:48 --- Created an attachment (id=15052) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15052&action=view) gcc43-pr35017.patch Alternative patch, which only pedwarns in inline definitions as defined in 4.7.6p6 as before,

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-29 17:39 --- BTW, the patch I've attached doesn't bootstrap, got an error on bitmap.c. Simplified testcase: typedef int bitmap_element; typedef struct { bitmap_element *first; } *bitmap; extern void bitmap_clear (bitmap); static v

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-29 17:31 --- Created an attachment (id=15051) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15051&action=view) gcc43-pr35017.patch TREE_READONLY isn't modifiable, so I guess that part is quite clear and I'm also pretty sure

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-29 17:07 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11377 says otherwise. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35017

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, rejects-valid Priority|P3

[Bug c/35017] [4.3 Regression] PR11377 pedwarns even about valid code

2008-01-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35017