[Bug c/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 21:26 --- http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/65774.htm?page=4 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426

[Bug c/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 21:25 --- The SGI compiler restricts the pragma to innermost loops. The Intel compiler restricts the pragma to affect assumed data-dependencies only, that is, if data dependence analysis statically can prove a data-dependency

[Bug c/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 21:23 --- http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi/0650/bks/SGI_Developer/books/Pragmas/sgi_html/ch08.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33426

[Bug c/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 21:21 --- #pragma ivdep Says the compiler may assume the following loop nest does not have loop carried data dependenices. Supported at least by SGI CC and the Intel compiler. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug c/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 21:14 --- What are the exact semantics of ivdep? Please provide them before asking if we support it. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c/33426] Support of #pragma ivdep

2007-09-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-13 21:12 --- Confirmed. Zdenek, we should now be able to attach this to loop information and preserve it until data dependence analysis, right? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed