--- Comment #4 from tim dot bruylants at vub dot ac dot be 2007-08-31
19:30 ---
Thank you for this explanation.
A friend of me also found an explaining document on
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n926.htm. Looking at 12.4.1
seems to be the case that I am in... and it's
--- Comment #3 from tim dot bruylants at vub dot ac dot be 2007-08-31
19:05 ---
Can someone please explain me why this behavior is correct according to the
specifications? Isn't the function call issuing a new sequence point? Isn't the
++(*p_a); statement in the function a separate sequ
--- Comment #2 from raeburn at raeburn dot org 2007-08-31 19:04 ---
Subject: Re: New: Wrong evaluation
On Aug 31, 2007, at 11:05, tim dot bruylants at vub dot ac dot be wrote:
> The following code generates a "1" with gcc-4.1 and generates a "2"
> with a lot
> of other compilers (Vi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 16:09 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11751 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
