--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-25 20:59 ---
*** Bug 20197 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-12-17 15:48 ---
re. comment #5, like this?
Index: gcc.c
===
--- gcc.c (revision 128902)
+++ gcc.c (working copy)
@@ -4685,6 +4685,8 @@ do_spec_1 (const char *spec,
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 15:26 ---
*** Bug 34479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 05:03 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=14537)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14537&action=view) [edit]
> Idea for a fix
>
> I started on a patch for this a few months ago. It basical
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 05:00 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=14538)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14538&action=view) [edit]
> Better patch
>
Please, bootstrap and run the testsuite, then send the patch t
--- Comment #3 from dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 04:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=14538)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14538&action=view)
Better patch
Sorry, this one's cleaner. That other one included some other cleanup that I
think already went in.
--- Comment #2 from dsh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 04:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=14537)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14537&action=view)
Idea for a fix
I started on a patch for this a few months ago. It basically just prepended ./
to all the temporary
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 03:27 ---
This is confirmed. I think the problem is in the specs in gcc.c:
%{!combine:\
%{save-temps|traditional-cpp|no-integrated-cpp:%(trad_capable_cpp) \
%(cpp_options) -o %{save-temps:%b.i} %
