--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-01 19:28 ---
I think this change is wrong; weak definitions are also used to allow
definitions in multiple translation units without linker errors. C++ inlines
are emitted as weak symbols, and it seems rather odd to prohibit in C
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-27 16:35 ---
Subject: Bug 32511
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 27 16:34:55 2008
New Revision: 133646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133646
Log:
2008-03-27 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-27 16:35 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from sabre at nondot dot org 2008-02-18 07:35 ---
That works for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-17 21:05 ---
Well, I think we should error for the inline + weak combination, as it doesn't
make sense.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
--- Comment #3 from sabre at nondot dot org 2008-02-17 19:48 ---
I understand the desire to optimize with -fpic, but miscompiling the code seems
unreasonable...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-17 19:37 ---
I think this is feature. If users explicitely declares as inline, then we do
that, otherwise we doesn't:
/* Don't auto-inline anything that might not be bound within
this unit of translation. */
else if (!
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 20:32 ---
Considering inline candidate bar.
Inlining bar into foo.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511
10 matches
Mail list logo
