--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 19:32 ---
*** Bug 32517 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-06-18 22:01
---
The attached patch, written by Anatoly Sokolov, fixes the bug.
--
eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-06-18 22:00
---
Created an attachment (id=13733)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13733&action=view)
Patch to fix bug, written by Anatoly Sokolov
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31331
--- Comment #1 from j at uriah dot heep dot sax dot de 2007-04-12 16:32
---
I disagree the "invalid syntax". According to the formal attribute syntax
description:
``Any list of specifiers and qualifiers at the start of a declaration may
contain attribute specifiers, whether or not suc
