--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29129
--- Comment #3 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-09-19 13:04
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Strictly conforming code rejected
joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:-
> > foo.c:1: error: '[*]' not allowed in other than a declaration
>
> As the diagnostic indicates, "unsigne
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-09-19 11:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: Strictly conforming code rejected
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, neil at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Compile the following with -std=c99 -pedantic-errors
>
> void f(unsigned int [*]);
>
> foo.c:1: erro
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 03:24 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 4.1.2 which we accepted this but gave a warning
saying we don't implement the semantics yet. Since we accepted this with a
warning before and now reject it, I am going to say this is a r
