--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 18:20 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 18:14 ---
Subject: Bug 29116
Author: jsm28
Date: Sun Mar 29 18:13:43 2009
New Revision: 145254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145254
Log:
PR c/456
PR c/5675
PR c/19976
PR
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-24 19:36 ---
Subject: Bug 29116
Author: jsm28
Date: Fri Oct 24 19:34:52 2008
New Revision: 141349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141349
Log:
PR c/456
PR c/5675
PR c/19976
PR
--- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-24 00:08 ---
Testing a patch for 4.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assign
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-06 09:54 ---
The issue is we are folding 0*n into 0 but not marking it as being non
constant, we could use the infrastructure provided by the patch for PR 32643
and set folding_initializer correctly while folding of the array siz
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-17 15:26 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
