--- Comment #3 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-05-22 22:45 ---
I think it can be closed invalid.
--
raj dot khem at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-05-22 21:27 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think this is a bug. bar is not delay from outputting as it will
> needs
> to be outputted. Now you can agrue this is a bug. Also 3.4 did not have
> these sorry messages so it i
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-22 21:12 ---
I don't think this is a bug. bar is not delay from outputting as it will needs
to be outputted. Now you can agrue this is a bug. Also 3.4 did not have
these sorry messages so it is not a regression, just did not
