--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:28
---
Andrew --
Since you're unwilling to close this PR, I'll leave it open. However, it's P5;
I trust OpenMP users to be able to figure out how to find the OpenMP pragmas.
-- Mark
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot o
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:26 ---
Also we list extensions to C89 which are in C99 too so documenting this in
"Extensions to the C Language Family" is the correct thing to do.
And nothing links directly to the spec, I have to go through another web p
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:23 ---
Also the pragmas should be listed under:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Pragmas.html#Pragmas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26154
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:20 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I agree that since there is a reference to the specification in -fopenmp it is
> not necessary to do more to document OpenMP in our manual. (If we have
> extensions to OpenMP they should b
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-17 00:06
---
I agree that since there is a reference to the specification in -fopenmp it is
not necessary to do more to document OpenMP in our manual. (If we have
extensions to OpenMP they should be documented, but that's anot
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 18:03
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Diego, would you be able to put a pointer in the manual?
>
There are two references to the OpenMP API already. One in the documentation
of -fopenmp, the other with the documentation of
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 17:33
---
Yes, there should at least be a reference to online information about OpenMP in
our manual. At this is one of the major new features in 4.2, it should
definitely be documented. Diego, would you be able to put a p
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 03:00 ---
It should be something like what XLC does at:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/lnxpcomp/v8v101/topic/com.ibm.xlcpp8l.doc/compiler/ref/ruprpdir.htm#RUPRPDIR
Which is actually much better than what is even in
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 13:44 ---
This is a regression as the document is out of date now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
