--- Comment #10 from jw203198 at hotmail dot com 2005-11-30 04:16 ---
>
> If you use -E -H -g -fno-working-directory, you will not see the directory
> name.
Thanks, I can use that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25175
--- Comment #9 from ian at airs dot com 2005-11-30 04:06 ---
This is documented behaviour.
The -g option enables the -fworking-directory option, as described in the
documentation of -fworking-directory. It is the -fworking-directory option
which is printing the directory name.
If you
--- Comment #8 from jw203198 at hotmail dot com 2005-11-30 03:52 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > > Your orginal example does not show a difference for -H at all.
> Wait a minute, -E outputs the preprocessed source. -H outputs the files which
> are included.
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 03:42 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > Your orginal example does not show a difference for -H at all.
Wait a minute, -E outputs the preprocessed source. -H outputs the files which
are included.
Again this is not a bug.
-
--- Comment #6 from jw203198 at hotmail dot com 2005-11-30 03:37 ---
> Your orginal example does not show a difference for -H at all.
Does for me:
pc:~/work/stats $ cc -E -H x.c
# 1 "x.c"
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 "x.c"
main(){}
and:
pc:~/work/stats $ cc -E -H -g
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 03:06 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Can you show where -H will give you the CWD?
> Use my original example and add -H.
Your orginal example does not show a difference for -H at all.
pc64:~> gcc -H t.c -g
pc64:~> gcc -H t.c
--- Comment #4 from jw203198 at hotmail dot com 2005-11-30 02:55 ---
> Can you show where -H will give you the CWD?
Use my original example and add -H.
I *never* had "-save-temps" in my example so I don't understand why you are
corrupting my example so. And I *never* used a -S flag ei
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 02:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That is rather unfortunate.
> Because if you use the -H option then you will get different output depending
> on whether you use "-g" or not. So while you might be helping the
> "-save-tem
--- Comment #2 from jw203198 at hotmail dot com 2005-11-30 02:18 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The current directory is outputted so that when compiling with -save-temps -g
> is no different from -g. The double // is not really a problem at all.
>
That is rather unfortunate.
Because
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 02:14 ---
The current directory is outputted so that when compiling with -save-temps -g
is no different from -g. The double // is not really a problem at all.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
10 matches
Mail list logo
