--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 01:38 ---
This code still involes undefined runtime behavior. So the warning is valid.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from mishabear at gmail dot com 2005-11-29 07:44 ---
Subject: Re: GCC issues warnings to a syntactically correct expression.
In fact I want to do something lik this:
int main()
{
int ia[10];
int *pi, i;
i=10;
pi = ( ((i>=0) && (i<10)) ? (
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 06:28 ---
Note the warning is to warn things like:
a = a++;
which is syntactically correct but semantically questionable.
Note there are a lot of things which are syntactially correct but are
semantically questionable
--
