[Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning

2005-10-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:13 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Andrew, what is your point about the C++ front-end? What is it you think is > wrong? There is no mention of the C++ front-end here at all. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

[Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning

2005-10-30 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:02 --- The patch in Comment #1 has been applied. Andrew, what is your point about the C++ front-end? What is it you think is wrong? In any case, this will never be release critical. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot o

[Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning

2005-09-27 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.2 |4.0.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22297

[Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning

2005-08-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-05 04:10 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c/22297] [4.0/4.1 Regression] missing uninitialization warning

2005-07-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-04 20:46 --- The patch here fixes one issue: . But the next problem is located in the front-end: #0 default_function_array_conversion (exp={value = 0x41da9f00,