--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-28 10:45
---
c90-const-expr-2.c and c99-const-expr-2.c already contain assertions that
(void *)(void *)0 is not a null pointer constant; this just part of the known
constant expressions issues.
*** This bug has been mark
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-28
02:08 ---
Subject: Re: New: GCC accepts invalid code
On Sat, 28 May 2005, neil at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> gcc -Wall -ansi -pedantic -fsyntax-only
>
> erroneously accepts the following:
>
> void bar(void);
>
