--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07
13:37 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> this is where __attribute__((unused)) kicks in..
But these shows up in system headers too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20562
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20562
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20562
--- Additional Comments From mueller at kde dot org 2005-03-20 23:22
---
this is where __attribute__((unused)) kicks in..
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20562
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-03-20 22:46
---
IIRC, this was intentional because people had a habit of writing RCS
"$ID:" strings at the top of files and wanted to find them again in
the executable to identify which files exactly were linked together.
--- Additional Comments From mueller at kde dot org 2005-03-19 23:32
---
whoops, wrong frontend.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCO
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-19
23:19 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > There should be a "defined but not used" warning.
>
> Why, this is a constant array so it is removed right?
Never mind, but I can tell you this wa
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-19
23:16 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> There should be a "defined but not used" warning.
Why, this is a constant array so it is removed right?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20562
