[Bug c/20531] gcc should warn about undefined behaviour

2005-03-19 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-19 13:18 --- I see no undefined behavior here. The order is unspecified, not undefined, and there is nothing more wrong with accessing two volatile objects between sequence points than there would be in (s.x = 1) + (s.y =

[Bug c/20531] gcc should warn about undefined behaviour

2005-03-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18 13:44 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW