--- Comment #6 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-19 20:21 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-19 20:20 ---
Subject: Bug 19771
Author: jsm28
Date: Sun Apr 19 20:19:54 2009
New Revision: 146358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146358
Log:
PR c/19771
* c-semantics.c (pop_stmt_list): Propa
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 22:38 ---
Jakub, this is what we discussed last night.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 22:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=17557)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17557&action=view)
Always create a new BIND_EXPR for VLA decls
I tried to make use of scopes: If a label is defined in a parent sco
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-12 00:09
---
The problem here is that the C front end is not creating a new BIND_EXPR
for the scope starting at the declaration for X. Insert one by hand and
you'll see that the tree optimizers are doing the right thing.
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-03
02:35 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
