https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-18 01:38:34 |2021-2-10
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
Ryan Lortie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||desrt at desrt dot ca
--- Comment #7 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-03
10:00:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 3 09:17:44 2013
New Revision: 197393
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197393&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/19449
* tree.h (force_fold
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-28
08:53:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 29742
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29742
gcc49-pr19449.patch
Untested patch. There is another case where we'd better fold
__builti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek 2013-03-28
06:57:56 UTC ---
*** Bug 56759 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||przemoc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 f
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14
19:26 ---
The problem is the __builtin_constant_p is delayed for evalutation until
optimizations are run but
__builtin_choose_expr needs an answer right away.
What we could do is for when processing the first argu
--- Additional Comments From eplondke at gmail dot com 2005-01-14 19:22
---
Created an attachment (id=7961)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7961&action=view)
Test case as a file.
Test case as a file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
