--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-14 22:25
---
*** Bug 21033 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02
18:20 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02
18:03 ---
Subject: Bug 19435
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-02 18:03:21
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog c-typeck.c
gcc/tes
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:04
---
Testing a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm28
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21
14:36 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I have very similar situation but with even worse results:
The C++ problem is recorded in a different bug (that might have been my fault
for not testing the C++
front-end), see
--- Additional Comments From mmikucionis at gmail dot com 2005-01-21 14:31
---
my last comment was close to this bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18926
sorry
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435
--- Additional Comments From mmikucionis at gmail dot com 2005-01-21 13:37
---
I have very similar situation but with even worse results:
struct foo {
int i;
char* s[];
} arr[] = {
{
1, { "first", "second" }
},
{
2, { "third", "fourth" }
}
};
gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-14
03:13 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
