--- Additional Comments From zhangyijin_2008 at 163 dot com 2004-11-23
11:39 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I agree that this is a bug, and I think it's been fixed now for gcc-4.x, but
I'm
> not going to attempt to back-port the fix to the branch, given the possible
> work-around outlin
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-23
10:57 ---
I agree that this is a bug, and I think it's been fixed now for gcc-4.x, but I'm
not going to attempt to back-port the fix to the branch, given the possible
work-around outlined below.
The reason for the '
--- Additional Comments From zhangyijin_2008 at 163 dot com 2004-11-23
06:44 ---
I test with:
int main( void )
{
double a = 12.34;
printf( "%8.8f\n" );
return 0;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18620
--- Additional Comments From zhangyijin_2008 at 163 dot com 2004-11-23
05:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Are you sure really sure?
> Arm is both a bigendian and little-endian target.
When I compiler with "arm-linux-gcc -S test.c"
//test.s
.file "test.c"
.text
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
GCC target triplet|arm-9tdmi-linux-gnu |ep9312
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18620
