--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-23
23:51 ---
Subject: Bug 18282
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-23 23:50:56
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 19:24
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10
19:23 ---
Subject: Bug 18282
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-10 19:23:25
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09
22:57 ---
Subject: Bug 18282
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-09 22:56:58
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: attr-mode-2.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-09
22:55 ---
Subject: Bug 18282
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-09 22:55:43
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog attribs.c c-common.c
Log
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24
22:18 ---
Subject: Bug 18282
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-rhl-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-24 22:18:16
Modified files:
gcc: Ch
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-05 04:07
---
I'm not going to hold up 3.4.3 for this issue.
Richard's change makes this an error, so it's at most a rejects-valid. There's
also a good workaround: declare the enum __attribute__((packed)). That's
proba
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-03 07:45 ---
Seems the attribute worked before (and with the patch I posted on gcc-3_4-branch
as well) when used on a decl with enum type, but not when used on enum's typedef.
On the other side, current trunk works when it
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-02 23:18 ---
Subject: Re: PR c/17384 patch causes regression from 3.4.2
Jakub --
Since Richard says this is not a regression, but rather a case where the
compiler is now correctly diagnosing code that previously did not
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-02 23:14 ---
NOT a regression. The mode argument was IGNORED, silently, by previous versions.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-10/msg00715.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
11 matches
Mail list logo
