https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
You could always compile the packages that fail with C23 with -std=gnu17 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283
--- Comment #4 from Brecht Sanders
---
Thanks for clarifying.
So it seems this is by design and there is nothing to fix in GCC.
Unfortunately that means a lot of packages will need to fix their source if
they still want them to build using th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #0)
> - `bool` now seems to be defined in C. Several projects use bool as a
> variable name or define it using typedef, both of which will result in
> compile errors.
Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Brecht Sanders from comment #0)
We hit a bunch of issues like this during the 14 cycle when we started to
enforce C99 properly and fixed issues like this while we were there. Recent
versions of aut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
