https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115496
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115496
--- Comment #6 from Andi Kleen ---
Yes a # check would need to be target dependent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115496
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
# can also start a number in aarch64 and arm assembly and not a comment.
So NO `#` is not universally starts a comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115496
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
A possible input to the logic could be: be more paranoid about strings that
will be used by inline asm.
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #3)
> When writing inline assembler an alternative to \n is to us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115496
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen ---
When writing inline assembler an alternative to \n is to use ; as separator
e.g.
asm("movl $1,%eax ; "
"movl %eax,%ebx")
there can be also comment mistake here like
asm("movl $1,%eax # comment ;"
"
