https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
--- Comment #5 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4)
> I believe the second form is still incorrect and it just works by luck. To
> ensure it work you have to do:
>
> asm("mov %1,%0":"=r"(n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
--- Comment #3 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
Thanks a lot, I have checked it out.
I'm still somewhat confused. Does the difference in compilation stem from GCC
interpreting "=m" and "=r" differently, leading it to assume t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114597
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
