https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #11 from Costas Argyris ---
As I said before, I think adding the "-o" flag to
$(COMPILER) -c $< -o $@
is a good and harmless change, but, as per your own report, it didn't solve
your issues because you still got that mysterious lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #10 from Costas Argyris ---
Hi Huaqi,
This is building a larger project, which gcc is part of.I am not familiar
with that larger project and I have never built it.
Could we extract only the gcc-specific part out of the entire b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #9 from Huaqi ---
Hi, Costas Argyris,
I am using this repo to help build toolchain, the repo link is here:
https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain
clone this source code and its submodule, and change gcc to upstream ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #8 from Costas Argyris ---
Are you building the cross-compiler itself or just using an existing
cross-compiler to build for the windows host?
You may have to build the cross-compiler first from the latest gcc sources, and
then use t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #7 from Costas Argyris ---
Still can't do much without detailed info on how exactly you are building gcc,
what is your build setup, what is your cross-compiler version, OS, how you
configure etc etc...Ideally, solid reproduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #6 from Huaqi ---
I think it might be introduced by this commit
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/304c7d44a2212e6fd618587331cea2c266dc10bf,
since I tested this commit
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/4872e46e080c6695df
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #5 from Costas Argyris ---
>> Yes, because -o is missing.
I don't understand why -o missing is a problem some times but not others
(because this has been succesfully built before with -o missing).
Adding a "-o" flag seems OK to me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcaz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #3 from Costas Argyris ---
"The missing -o looks genuine, does not it?"
Not to me because this has been built successfully before.If this was the
problem then it would never build, right?
What happened in this case was that sym
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109460
--- Comment #1 from Costas Argyris ---
Can you give some more info on how exactly you are cross-building gcc for
windows host?
Did you add the -fno-PIE flag manually or was it part of the build process you
are following?
Seems like you are try
11 matches
Mail list logo
