https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107736
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107736
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to mfarca from comment #4)
> Thanks for creating the issue for improving documentation.
>
> Could you then clarify if call to the incorrect address is a bug or not?
> instructions are allowed to b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107736
--- Comment #4 from mfarca ---
Thanks for creating the issue for improving documentation.
Could you then clarify if call to the incorrect address is a bug or not?
instructions are allowed to be under `.rodata` section as this section is still
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107736
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107736
--- Comment #2 from mfarca ---
> Toplevel inline-asm will be emitted without any knowledge of the current
> section.
So this is a limitation of gcc I guess? as clang does have the knowledge on
which is which.
The main issue still persists as c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107736
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Keywords|
