https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100483
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Thanks for the clarification. I misinterpreted the documentation.
> Then it seems that -fno-semantic-interposition is a very safe optimization for
> distributions to default to. Closing as intended.
Basical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100483
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100483
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Symbol resolution in an executable or a shared library at run-time is
determined by
1. Linker options + all input files at link-time.
2. ld.so + all shared libraries at run-time.
Add a compiler option at compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100483
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100483
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100483
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
Another request is a new option: -fno-semantic-interposition-function. With
this option, we only assume functions cannot be interposed.
-fno-semantic-interposition assumes both functions and variables cannot
