https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1bba463bd0d5692b7fa58ee37a61a55b2517456
commit r11-7546-gd1bba463bd0d5692b7fa58ee37a61a55b2517456
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> > IIUC, those two types are actually the same, it's just that one of them was
> > obtained through the char_type ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or perhaps another option would be instead of
return mod;
do
return cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, mod, false, non_constant_p,
overflow_p);
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> IIUC, those two types are actually the same, it's just that one of them was
> obtained through the char_type alias, and it seems debug_tree prefers to
> show the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99287
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
