https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
--- Comment #4 from Denis Yaroshevskiy ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> Could you mark this bug as blocks PR98375
Done?
> ... waiting for Stage 1 of GCC 12 to be applied.)
So. the next gcc should have a fix? Fantastic! Will it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
Hi Denis Yaroshevskiy:
Could you mark this bug as blocks PR98375
(This metabug is used to track all the patches which have been written during
Stage 3 of GCC 11 but do not qualify for that stage, and are wai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
> So add combine splitter?
I'm testing this patch
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
gcc/config/i386/sse.md | 16 +++-
modified gcc/config/i386/sse.md
@@ -640,7 +640,8 @@ (define_mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
in rtl phase, gcc successfully simplify
(and:V4DI (not:V4DI (reg:V4DI 91))
(constm1_rtx)
to
(not:V4DI (reg:V4DI 91)).
But combine failed to match
(set (reg:SI 88)
(unspec:SI [
(s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
