[Bug c++/95763] Feature request: compiler warning if line width exceeds N symbols

2024-06-20 Thread mlevine55 at bloomberg dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95763 Michael Levine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mlevine55 at bloomberg dot net --- Comm

[Bug c++/95763] Feature request: compiler warning if line width exceeds N symbols

2021-04-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95763 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Severity|normal

[Bug c++/95763] Feature request: compiler warning if line width exceeds N symbols

2020-06-19 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95763 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/95763] Feature request: compiler warning if line width exceeds N symbols

2020-06-19 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95763 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- FWIW, the Ada front end has some style checking support (I once broke bootstrap by applying spelling corrections there, where fixing the spelling in a comment made a line too long). It wou

[Bug c++/95763] Feature request: compiler warning if line width exceeds N symbols

2020-06-19 Thread hyena at hyena dot net.ee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95763 --- Comment #2 from Erich Erstu --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > This seems like a better fit for something like clang-tidy than being > hardcoded into the compiler. I can see the reasoning there, but different source/header f

[Bug c++/95763] Feature request: compiler warning if line width exceeds N symbols

2020-06-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95763 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This seems like a better fit for something like clang-tidy than being hardcoded into the compiler.