https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, because that just makes it more awkward to write makefiles and build
scripts. We used to do that, and it had no real benefit. If you want to use
c++2a, you can use that. Other people just want to use c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
--- Comment #10 from Marco Trevisan ---
I see the point, but then I also think that gcc-10 should not support
`--std=c++20` option but rather only the `--std=c++2a` one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No. C++20 support in GCC 10 is missing a number of features, so it would be
misleading/incorrect to define it to 202002L.
https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx20
You can just test for > 201703L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
Marco Trevisan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at 3v1n0 dot net
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.2|10.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.0|10.2
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Don't we up __cplusplus only when we support all language features?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #2)
> You may have misunderstood my intentions here.
Yes, looks like I did. The way you phrased it (particularly "you need to use
this assertions so that there is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
--- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler ---
You may have misunderstood my intentions here. I was just trying to suggest a
change which I think is better for the consistency with the standard and with
clang which just implemented this change.
So yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Romain Geissler from comment #0)
> A few hours ago the clang folks did add explicit support for the flag
> -std=c++20, and not only did they change that, they also changed the value
> of __cplu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93821
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
12 matches
Mail list logo
