https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kacper.slominski72 at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benni at stuerz dot xyz
--- Comment #8 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 106287 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lichray at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The problem is the default Destructor in the Derived for the other examples.
So this can be reduced to just:
struct Base
{
constexpr virtual ~Base() = default;
};
constexpr Base b;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oleksandr.koval.dev at gmail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkeir at outlook dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Luke Dalessandro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93413
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
