https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #3 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
This would definitely be invalid C (the prior declaration visible in the
inner scope has no linkage, so the inner declaration has external linkage
and "If, within a translation unit, the sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91075
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
