https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 21 21:58:19 2019
New Revision: 272576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-06-21 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/90909
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 21 20:47:40 2019
New Revision: 272574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2019-06-21 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/90909
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 21 20:46:51 2019
New Revision: 272573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272573&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2019-06-21 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/90909
R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
I think the below tweak of r271490 should be fine, it considers the bases only
when the fn isn't pure virtual:
Index: call.c
===
--- call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90909
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
