https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Taewook Oh from comment #5)
> The name of the function is "void llvm::SmallVectorTemplateBase >::grow(size_t) [with T =
> std::pair, const
> llvm::DICompositeType*>; bool = false]".
>
> I tried
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538
--- Comment #5 from Taewook Oh ---
The name of the function is "void llvm::SmallVectorTemplateBase
>::grow(size_t) [with T = std::pair, const
llvm::DICompositeType*>; bool = false]".
I tried with GCC 7.4.0, and seems that GCC 7.4.0 doesn't atte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
>
> So I investigated further to figure out which instruction actually sets
> "0x0" to the new location, and found that instruction 202aef4 below is the
> one
>
> 202aed0: 48 c7 00 00 00 00 00 movq $0x0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538
--- Comment #3 from Taewook Oh ---
Here's the compiler command and the preprocessed source.
command: https://gist.github.com/taewookoh/45e710594497b887e2ac54168c86c17f
source: https://gist.github.com/taewookoh/00f38b4a2f617e78b30d33c8103a7703
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89538
--- Comment #1 from Taewook Oh ---
And I confirmed that this bug doesn't reproduce with GCC5.
