https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||litteras at ukr dot net
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
--- Comment #5 from Ole Kniemeyer ---
Thanks for asking the committee. I think the standard makes sense as it is,
because otherwise there is no chance to name the template parameter (that's
what I need in my specific situation where I found the b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I've asked the C++ committee to clarify whether the example is bogus or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
--- Comment #3 from Ole Kniemeyer ---
Yes, I also tried other compilers, and all of them fail. But in [temp.local] it
is explicitly stated that "the name of a member of the class template hides the
name of a template-parameter of any enclosing cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #2 from Jona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87841
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 87842 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
