https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87494
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87494
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is techincally a bug. It might be a missed optimization but
not a bug. You still need a definition even for constexpr if used outside of a
constexpr usage IIRC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87494
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
